Webinar: Leveraging Analytical Procedures to the Fullest on Audits - Case Studies in Strengthening Audit Evidence
WB426 | Course | Basic | Scheduled
Description
Peer review deficiencies commonly relate to the design, documentation, and evaluation of the results of analytical procedures. This course will provide examples of how to strengthen evidence resulting from preliminary, substantive, and final analytics. It will reinforce the elements of strong analytical procedures that may enhance the quality of audits.
Credits
| Number of Credits | Type of Credits |
|---|---|
| 2.00 | Accounting |
Designed For
Anyone who performs audits
Prerequisites
None
Highlights
- How well-designed analytic procedures enhance audit quality
- Elements of strong analytic procedures
- Selecting the proper analytic, and altering the strength for the intended purpose
- Evaluating the data used in generating expectations
- Improving documentation, including evaluating sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained
Objectives
- Recall how analytic procedures can enhance audit quality
- Explain elements of strong analytic procedures that can eliminate or mitigate the need for extensive tests of details
- Describe tips for improving documentation of the design, documentation and evaluation of substantive analytic procedures
Preparation
None
Notes
This webcast is provided by ACPEN. After registering for the course, you will receive an email from ACPEN with instructions for logging in to the webcast and obtaining your eMaterials.
Prices
- Member (Early Bird)
- $79.00
- Non-Member (Early Bird)
- $109.00
- Member
- $79.00
- Non-Member
- $109.00